Washington Tools Offers Wing Nuts

66

By Springboard

See all 2 photos

Here they come in droves and I knew they would. It would only be a matter of time. That's how these things go. They, being the assorted wing nuts in Washington of course, and the left wing, lame stream media (to borrow a phrase from Bernie Goldberg).

Here they come, indeed, and they've brought shovels with them.

The thing is, we're drawing nearer to the mid-term elections in November. Clearly the democrats are out of favor with the American people, and they know this. One need only look out their window and see that a very strong conservative third party movement is well under way in this country, and it's been born out of Washington's failure to get the work of the people done. It's been born out of a discontent that's spreading like wildfire.

This, of course, bodes well for the republicans, even if some would say that voting for republicans is akin to simply voting for the lesser of two evils right now. But just the very fact that the republican party has a strong chance of uprooting the stranglehold the democrats are currently enjoying the power of having scares the hell out of them. The left wing is now scrambling to save themselves from what I think will be a decisive, and grinding defeat.

Here's where folks start clutching at straws.

What I'm talking about is all the news out now about the resignation of the RNC chief of staff surrounding a scandal over lavish spending by republicans, using campaign contributions for booze, and prostitutes, and flying on private jets while the economy was in a free fall, and regular Americans were suffering hard financial times. The left wing is going to try and make a huge story out of this. They need to do all they can to divert the focus off of their own massive spending and the health care bill they just passed that no one wanted.

Might I only add here the incredulity of anyone on the left, media or otherwise, to scoff at spending too much money. Haven't they sort of made an art out of doing exactly that?

Yes. True, these were campaign contributions. The money they spent on these lavish items were paid by the folks expecting the money would go to advancing the cause of the republican party. It is deplorable. No doubt about that. This should not have happened. But how in the world is this comparable to what the democrats have done since they've had all the power? Trillions of dollars of taxpayers money have been squandered away on foolish programs and on an undeniable socialist agenda. And what of the results? Sure, in their eyes the democrats had a massive victory with their health care bill. But if 52% of the American people said no to it, then how can this be noted as an accomplishment? And what about the spending that hasn't even hit the books yet?—like say, the real costs coming farther down the line when this health care bill really get it's wheels turning.

The wing nuts are going to make all they can out of this. And this is, of course, just the tip of iceberg as well. We all know that. Like I said, they've got their shovels ready and they're going to be looking deep for any smidgen of dirt they can find.

Granted, mudslinging will come from both sides. It always does. But clearly this time around the democrats come to the mud fight already well covered in the stuff, so calling the other guy dirty is the pot calling the kettle black.

What I want to see is an honest and spirited debate from all sides, republican, democrat, and tea party alike. I want to hear what is going to be done, and I want details. Enough is enough with wishy-washy verbiage that doesn't really tell us anything substantive. And I don't want finger pointing by any side in the debate. "It's all Obama's fault" will get us as far as "It's all Bush's fault" got the democrats.

Still, if any scandal is going to be exposed, hashed out, dissected, and made into a "big effing deal," this one is the one to start with, and it's a doozie if ever there was one, let me tell you—friggin' Obamacare is as big as it gets.

Comments

Tom Whitworth profile image

Tom Whitworth Level 5 Commenter 2 years ago

Springboard,

Right is right and wrong is wrong, but the massive deficits of over $1 trillion a year as far as the eye can see is really beyond the pail!!!!!!!!!!

breakfastpop profile image

breakfastpop Level 8 Commenter 2 years ago

Great hub, but the chances of straightforward honest debate grow slimmer with each passing day. We need a clean slate in Washington and I mean everyone!

Springboard profile image

Springboard Hub Author 2 years ago

The both of you are spot on.

greatAmerican profile image

greatAmerican 2 years ago

Spring, we Can't look at the Tea Party as a third party, we need to keep in mind that if the Republicans do not offer some truly conservative candidates, we need to look for independent candidates. This could probably help Democrats in 2010 but it we are ever going to get Washington to listen to the people of this country, Democrats, Republicans, are not the answer. We can't break the Democrats, the Republicans are in self destruct mode, they don't understand why and seem to think moderate is their winning card, it is not, we need good conservative independent candidates to take this country back..

Springboard profile image

Springboard Hub Author 2 years ago

I certainly cannot disagree with the conservative perspective. John McCain was a teeming example of the loss of conservative roots in the republican party which is, I think, essential to it's continued viability. As for the tea party movement, my big issue with it is its lack of a well defined platform. There's too much scattering right now of ideals, too many loose ends that it makes it difficult to determine exactly where a particular candidate might be situated politically. Granted, that's perhaps not so different for any candidate in any party, but there is at least a common thread in either party that we can readily identify. The tea party does not have that, although the message is becoming clearer.

We've got a ton of issues in this country, and what we are going to have to hear from ANYONE running from any party or affiliation is HOW we will do the things we say we want to do. It's not going to be enough to just say "we're gonna change things," because we have no idea what that change means until it's too late.

One thing I'm sure of is that this election cycle is going to roll some heads. This is as strong a movement as I have seen in my lifetime. I'm actually pretty excited.

Pamela99 profile image

Pamela99 Level 7 Commenter 2 years ago

Springboard, This is a good hub and to the point. I would hope to have an honest debate but I don't think anything is honest my anybody in Washington anymore. I feel like Pop remarked, a clean slate would be good but I sure want the Democratic stranglehold is broken. I dread all the hype to come and yet want to see big changes. Good hub.

sheila b. Level 4 Commenter 2 years ago

I agree with you.

thevoice profile image

thevoice 2 years ago

well done hub

lctodd1947 profile image

lctodd1947 Level 2 Commenter 2 years ago

Springboard, I couldn't agree with you more. Well said and the truth. It is as the Dems have lost their high headed mind without respect for anyone trying to take over the USA. It is unreal to me that no one can stand up for what is right...It's crazy and they will loose in November, I hope....Thanks for sharing

Springboard profile image

Springboard Hub Author 2 years ago

Pamela—Certainly a clean slate is needed, but I'm not so convinced that's all we need. Those new faces best have something to say about how they will put their ideas to work for the American people. Let us not forget Barack Obama was technically a fresh face and we can see now what path that has led us all down. We need more than just rhetoric and promises, we need solutions and people who can put them into action.

Let's keep our fingers crossed we don't end up with just more of the same old, same old.

Springboard profile image

Springboard Hub Author 2 years ago

lctodd—what never ceases to amaze me is how much more divided the country has become under this president. And he was supposed to break partisan barriers...I think he only built bigger walls.

Ann Nonymous profile image

Ann Nonymous 2 years ago

Hey Springboard! I love reading your work as your style is truly your style! Well done!

Springboard profile image

Springboard Hub Author 2 years ago

Thanks. :) Glad you could make it in for a visit.

Dolores Monet profile image

Dolores Monet Level 7 Commenter 2 years ago

George Bush was supposed to break partisan walls. Barak Obama was supposed to break partisan walls. I think most Americans are nice people who do not sling mud, insult the other side, or hate monger. I feel like there are certain groups who thrive on the divisiveness and that both left and right regular folk have more in common than they want to believe.

Springboard profile image

Springboard Hub Author 2 years ago

I agree with you to some extent. Without a doubt, we're all a little guilty of the same.

There's a guy I follow on Facebook, Bamboo Bob, who made the assertion in a post that he thinks Bill O'Reilly is too soft on Barack Obama. What I said back to him was the following:

"We have to keep in mind that when we begin to only focus on the negative, regardless of who it is, it starts to look like bashing just as much as focusing only on the positive starts to look like "a slobbering love affair." I don't want to see bashing. I don't want to hear "he's always wrong," because NO ONE is always wrong, even Obama—even if he's MOSTLY wrong. I applaud Bill for his fairness. And I think when he IS fair, it does more to advance the truth, because when it sounds like bashing, the ears you WANT to hear the truth already tuned out long ago."

I also said, " I think Bill is telling it like it is. This is the problem sometimes with either side, too liberal or too conservative, that we shut out the truth when we don't like what it is, and we have this whacked out notion that we have to bash the other side for every statement, every idea, every action, irrespective of the merits, and then blow it all out of proportion. Look at what MSNBC is portraying the tea party movement as. If that's the kind of reporting and coverage and editorializing you want at Fox, then we're no better than the other side. In fact, some liberals DO actually watch Fox. In any news org. I want balance, I don't want any of them to act as an arm for either POV."

I think that if we want to see our way to progress in this country, we all need to view things with skepticism rather than all out doubt.

Sorry to have been a little winded in response BTW. Thanks for coming in and sharing your thoughts.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working